CPU
GPU
GeForce G205M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G205M is positioned at rank 442 and the Radeon HD 6250 is on rank 317, so the Radeon HD 6250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G205M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce G205M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GeForce G205M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G205M.
| Insight | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6250 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G205M and Radeon HD 6250
GeForce G205M
The GeForce G205M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Radeon HD 6250
The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G205M scores 92 and the Radeon HD 6250 reaches 94 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G205M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6250 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G205M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G205M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 94+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1408+450% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+343% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz+24% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 352 KB+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G205M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6250) — the GeForce G205M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G205M draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6250's 200W — a 170.4% difference. The GeForce G205M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G205M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-92% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+1060% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce G205M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 25 2016 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #864 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G205M and Radeon HD 6250
