
GeForce G205M

Mobility Radeon HD 2400
GeForce G205M vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G205M vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce G205M vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G205M
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G205M vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G205M
The GeForce G205M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G205M scores 92 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 reaches 90 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G205M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G205M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G205M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92+2% | 90 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+73% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce G205M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G205M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 carries 256 MB. GeForce G205M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G205M and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G205M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) — the GeForce G205M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G205M) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.0+21% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G205M) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G205M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G205M draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce G205M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G205M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-47% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+93% | 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce G205M (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce G205M | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #864 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














