GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA

GeForce G205M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 360M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 360M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G205M

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 16W instead of 189W, a 173W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 360M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 360M

2008

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1081.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 360M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G205M instead at 92 vs 87, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G205M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G205M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 360M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G205M vs Quadro FX 360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G205M

The GeForce G205M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 360M

The Quadro FX 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 87 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G205M scores 92 versus the Quadro FX 360M's 87 — the GeForce G205M leads by 5.7%. The GeForce G205M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 360M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G205M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 360M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G205M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 360M).

FeatureGeForce G205MQuadro FX 360M
G3D Mark Score
92+6%
87
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
256+7%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G205M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 360M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G205MQuadro FX 360M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G205M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 360M carries 256 MB. GeForce G205M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G205M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 360M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G205M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 360M) — the GeForce G205M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G205MQuadro FX 360M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G205M draws 16W versus the Quadro FX 360M's 189W — a 168.8% difference. The GeForce G205M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G205M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 360M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce G205MQuadro FX 360M
TDP
16W-92%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
5.8+1060%
0.5