Radeon HD 6470M
VS
GeForce GT 230M

Radeon HD 6470M vs GeForce GT 230M

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

2011Core: 680 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6470M is positioned at rank 382 and the GeForce GT 230M is on rank 95, so the GeForce GT 230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6470M

#372
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1206%
#374
1094%
#375
1091%
#379
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
992%
#380
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
985%
#382
Radeon HD 6470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
98%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
96%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
95%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
94%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
93%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
92%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 230M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
504%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
484%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
478%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
478%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
477%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
474%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
468%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
466%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
462%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
461%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
455%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
454%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
446%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
446%
#79
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
556%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
100%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
96%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
86%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
85%
#95
GeForce GT 230M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
99%
#97
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#98
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
96%
#100
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
94%
#101
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#102
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
91%
#103
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
88%
#106
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
82%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
82%
#108
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 230M is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce GT 230M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6470M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6470M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 230M.

InsightRadeon HD 6470MGeForce GT 230M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6470M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6470M and GeForce GT 230M

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

The Radeon HD 6470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6470M scores 225 and the GeForce GT 230M reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6470M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 230M uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230M). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230M).

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MGeForce GT 230M
G3D Mark Score
225+4%
216
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
960+150%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+16%
1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MGeForce GT 230M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MGeForce GT 230M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6470M draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 230M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MGeForce GT 230M
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
3.0
7.2+140%