Radeon HD 6470M
VS
Radeon R5 230

Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

2011Core: 680 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 230

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6470M is positioned at rank 382 and the Radeon R5 230 is on rank 500, so the Radeon HD 6470M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6470M

#372
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1206%
#374
1094%
#375
1091%
#379
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
992%
#380
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
985%
#382
Radeon HD 6470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
98%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
96%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
95%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
94%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
93%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
92%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 230

#490
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2445%
#492
2217%
#493
2211%
#497
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2010%
#498
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1997%
#500
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
100%
#501
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
100%
#502
Mobility Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#503
Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#504
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
98%
#505
GeForce 800A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#506
98%
#507
97%
#508
Radeon R7 M460
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#509
Mobility Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#510
GeForce 9800 S
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#511
95%
#512
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#513
95%
#514
Radeon HD 7660D
MSRP: $122|Avg: $15
95%
#515
Radeon HD 8650G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R5 230 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon R5 230 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6470M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6470M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 230.

InsightRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6470M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6470M and Radeon R5 230

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

The Radeon HD 6470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 230

The Radeon R5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6470M scores 225 and the Radeon R5 230 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6470M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 230 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 230). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 230).

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
G3D Mark Score
225+1%
222
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960+150%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+66%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+100%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6470M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 230 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6470M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon HD 6470M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6470M draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 230's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R5 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 230). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
3.0
4.4+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 230 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
MSRP
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Codename
Blackcomb
Weston
Release
January 4 2011
April 18 2017
Ranking
#654
#873