Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 230

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6470M

2011

Why buy it

  • 21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 230

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6470M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6470M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (225 vs 222), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6470M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 230 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6470M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6470M vs Radeon R5 230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6470M

The Radeon HD 6470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 230

The Radeon R5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6470M scores 225 and the Radeon R5 230 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6470M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 230 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 230). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 230).

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
G3D Mark Score
225+1%
222
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960+150%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+66%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+100%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6470M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 230 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6470M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6470M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 230. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon HD 6470M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6470M draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 230's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R5 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6470M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 230). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
3.0
4.4+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 230 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6470MRadeon R5 230
MSRP
$50
Codename
Blackcomb
Weston
Release
January 4 2011
April 18 2017
Ranking
#654
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.