Radeon HD 6480M
VS
Radeon 3015e

Radeon HD 6480M vs Radeon 3015e

AMD

Radeon HD 6480M

2010Boost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 3015e

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6480M is positioned at rank 304 and the Radeon 3015e is on rank 414, so the Radeon HD 6480M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6480M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3087%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2966%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2931%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2926%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2920%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2903%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2867%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2856%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2830%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2822%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2788%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2782%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2732%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2730%
#288
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3404%
#303
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#304
Radeon HD 6480M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#305
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
97%
#307
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
95%
#309
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#311
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#312
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
#313
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
84%
#314
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
83%
#315
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
82%
#316
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
80%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
80%
#318
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3015e

#404
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1516%
#406
1375%
#407
1371%
#411
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1247%
#412
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1238%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
99%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
97%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
97%
#419
96%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
96%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
96%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
93%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
93%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3015e is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon 3015e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6480M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6480M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3015e.

InsightRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6480M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6480M and Radeon 3015e

AMD

Radeon HD 6480M

The Radeon HD 6480M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points. Launch price was $239.

AMD

Radeon 3015e

The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6480M scores 353 and the Radeon 3015e reaches 351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6480M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 3015e uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 6480M) vs 512 (Radeon 3015e). Raw compute: 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6480M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
G3D Mark Score
353
351
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1120+119%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.016 TFLOPS+62%
1.247 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1218 MHz+35%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
224 KB+75%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6480M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3015e). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)+7%
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon HD 6480M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 3015e).

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
Encoder
VCN 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.0
VCN 1.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6480M draws 151W versus the Radeon 3015e's 50W — a 100.5% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6480M) vs 350W (Radeon 3015e). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
TDP
151W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.3
7.0+204%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 3015e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6480MRadeon 3015e
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$49
Codename
Barts
Polaris 23
Release
October 21 2010
May 13 2019
Ranking
#661
#757