Radeon HD 6550D
VS
Quadro FX 4600

Radeon HD 6550D vs Quadro FX 4600

AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

2010Boost: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6550D is positioned at rank 207 and the Quadro FX 4600 is on rank 404, so the Radeon HD 6550D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6550D

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1270%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1220%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1206%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1204%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1202%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1195%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1180%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1175%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1165%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1161%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1147%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1145%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1124%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1124%
#192
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1401%
#207
Radeon HD 6550D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
100%
#208
Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $67
100%
#209
Radeon R7 A360
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
99%
#210
Radeon R5 235X
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#211
Radeon HD 7290
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
98%
#212
Radeon HD 8210
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
98%
#213
Radeon HD 8330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#214
GeForce GT 520
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
96%
#215
GeForce GT 420
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
96%
#216
Radeon HD4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
96%
#217
GeForce GTX 275
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#219
Radeon HD 7400G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#220
Radeon HD 7480D
MSRP: $53|Avg: $30
93%
#221
Radeon HD 7520G
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
92%
#222
Radeon HD 8350G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600

#387
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
73865%
#403
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
100%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
100%
#405
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
90%
#406
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
85%
#408
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
80%
#409
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
80%
#411
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
60%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
50%
#415
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
45%
#416
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
40%
#417
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
40%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 4600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (768 MB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6550D.

InsightRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 4600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $70), it costs 29% less, resulting in a 41.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+41.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6550D and Quadro FX 4600

AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6550D scores 400 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6550D is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).

FeatureRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
G3D Mark Score
400
403
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1408+633%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.253 TFLOPS+387%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
88+38%
64
L2 Cache
512 KB+167%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6550D comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6550D) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) — the Radeon HD 6550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.75 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+167%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6550D draws 200W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro FX 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6550D) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
TDP
200W
150W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
2.0
2.7+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6550D launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 and now averages $50. The Quadro FX 4600 costs 28.6% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 6550D) vs 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) — the Quadro FX 4600 offers 42.1% better value. The Radeon HD 6550D is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 6550DQuadro FX 4600
MSRP
$70-96%
$1999
Avg Price (30d)
$70
$50-29%
Performance per Dollar
5.7
8.1+42%
Codename
Cayman
GT200B
Release
December 14 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#623
#884