Radeon HD 6770M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon HD 6770M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6770M is positioned at rank 164 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is on rank 85, so the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6770M and Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon HD 6770M
The Radeon HD 6770M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 964 points.
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6770M scores 964 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 964 | 1,000+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6770M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6770M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6770M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 30W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 33.3+21% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770M | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | Whistler | Kaveri Spectre |
| Release | January 4 2011 | January 14 2014 |
| Ranking | #896 | #865 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6770M and Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
