Radeon HD 6800M vs Radeon R5 435

AMD

Radeon HD 6800M

2010Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6800M vs Radeon R5 435 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6800M vs Radeon R5 435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6800M vs Radeon R5 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6800M

2010

Why buy it

  • 100.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 403.3% higher power demand at 151W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 435

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 151W, a 121W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6800M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.8% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 435 instead at 762 vs 753, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 435 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 435 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6800M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6800M vs Radeon R5 435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6800M

The Radeon HD 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 753 points. Launch price was $239.

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6800M scores 753 and the Radeon R5 435 reaches 762 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6800M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 6800M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 435). Raw compute: 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6800M) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 6800MRadeon R5 435
G3D Mark Score
753
762+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1120+250%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.016 TFLOPS+206%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1030 MHz+14%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
56+180%
20
L1 Cache
224 KB+180%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6800MRadeon R5 435
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6800M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6800M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 435) — the Radeon HD 6800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6800MRadeon R5 435
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6800M draws 151W versus the Radeon R5 435's 30W — a 133.7% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6800M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 435). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6800MRadeon R5 435
TDP
151W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
5.0
25.4+408%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 435 (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6800MRadeon R5 435
MSRP
$80
Codename
Barts
Jet
Release
October 21 2010
May 15 2016
Ranking
#661
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.