
Radeon HD 6950 vs FireStream 9370

Radeon HD 6950
Popular choices:

FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (275mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6950 and FireStream 9370

Radeon HD 6950
The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6950 scores 2,593 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6950 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,593+3% | 2,528 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1600+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.253 TFLOPS | 2.64 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 352 KB+120% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6950 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 has 4 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_2 | 11.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6950 draws 200W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 6950) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.0+16% | 11.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800 and now averages $50. The FireStream 9370 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.9 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 50.6 (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 offers 95.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6950 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-63% | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9 | 50.6+95% |
| Codename | Cayman | Cypress |
| Release | December 14 2010 | June 23 2010 |
| Ranking | #623 | #631 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















