Radeon HD 6950
VS
GeForce GTX 465

Radeon HD 6950 vs GeForce GTX 465

AMD

Radeon HD 6950

2010Boost: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6950.

InsightRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (275mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 155.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+155.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6950 and GeForce GTX 465

AMD

Radeon HD 6950

The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6950 scores 2,593 and the GeForce GTX 465 reaches 2,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6950 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 465 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 465). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465).

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
G3D Mark Score
2,593
2,654+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1408+300%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.253 TFLOPS+163%
0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
88+100%
44
L1 Cache
352 KB
704 KB+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
102.6 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
DirectX
11_2
12 (11_0)+9%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950) vs None (GeForce GTX 465). Decoder: UVD 3 vs VP4.

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
Encoder
UVD 3
None
Decoder
UVD 3
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6950 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 465's 200W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 6950) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 465). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
TDP
200W
200W
Recommended PSU
500W-9%
550W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
275mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
13.0
13.3+2%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.9 (Radeon HD 6950) vs 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 156% better value.

FeatureRadeon HD 6950GeForce GTX 465
MSRP
$299
$279-7%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$40-60%
Performance per Dollar
25.9
66.3+156%
Codename
Cayman
GF100
Release
December 14 2010
May 31 2010
Ranking
#623
#618