
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro D300

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

FirePro D300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is positioned at rank 123 and the FirePro D300 is on rank 130, so the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro D300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 661.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+661.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and FirePro D300

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.

FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire scores 5,637 and the FirePro D300 reaches 5,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the FirePro D300 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 1,280 (FirePro D300).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,637 | 5,722+2% |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 12 (FirePro D300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire draws 50W versus the FirePro D300's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 350W (FirePro D300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 112.7+196% | 38.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro D300 launched at $500 and now averages $20. The FirePro D300 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 286.1 (FirePro D300) — the FirePro D300 offers 660.9% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-70% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6 | 286.1+661% |
| Codename | Blackcomb XT | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 6 2011 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #537 | #506 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















