Radeon HD 7290M
VS
GeForce 205

Radeon HD 7290M vs GeForce 205

AMD

Radeon HD 7290M

2012Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 205

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7290M is positioned at rank 619 and the GeForce 205 is on rank 614, so the GeForce 205 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7290M

#609
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4413%
#611
4001%
#612
3990%
#616
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3628%
#617
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3604%
#619
Radeon HD 7290M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
99%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
98%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
97%
#623
96%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
94%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#626
92%
#627
91%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
90%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
89%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
87%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
87%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
86%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 205

#604
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4308%
#606
3906%
#607
3895%
#611
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3542%
#612
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3518%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
99%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
99%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
99%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
98%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
97%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
96%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
94%
#623
93%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
92%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#626
90%
#627
89%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
88%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 205 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce 205 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7290M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 205 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7290M.

InsightRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 205 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7290M and GeForce 205

AMD

Radeon HD 7290M

The Radeon HD 7290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7290M scores 123 and the GeForce 205 reaches 126 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7290M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 205 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7290M) vs 384 (GeForce 205). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7290M) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205).

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
G3D Mark Score
123
126+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS+173%
0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+122%
144 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7290M) vs 10.1 (GeForce 205). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)+11%
10.1
OpenGL
4.4+33%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7290M) vs None (GeForce 205). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX,Xvid (Radeon HD 7290M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205).

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
Encoder
UVD 3
None
Decoder
UVD 3
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX,Xvid
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7290M draws 100W versus the GeForce 205's 10W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7290M) vs 350W (GeForce 205). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
TDP
100W
10W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
1.2
12.6+950%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 205 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7290MGeForce 205
MSRP
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
Wimbledon
GP108B
Release
April 24 2012
February 20 2019
Ranking
#531
#643