CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 7310M
Popular choices:
Radeon HDG 4670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7310M is positioned at rank 283 and the Radeon HDG 4670 is on rank 297, so the Radeon HD 7310M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HDG 4670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HDG 4670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7310M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HDG 4670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7310M and Radeon HDG 4670
Radeon HD 7310M
The Radeon HD 7310M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 166 points. Launch price was $59.
Radeon HDG 4670
The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7310M scores 166 and the Radeon HDG 4670 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7310M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HDG 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7310M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 166 | 170+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+340% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7310M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HDG 4670) — the Radeon HDG 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7310M draws 47W versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 250W — a 136.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7310M) vs 350W (Radeon HDG 4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 47W-81% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 193mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5+400% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7310M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7310M | Radeon HDG 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cayman |
| Release | May 1 2013 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #841 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7310M and Radeon HDG 4670
