CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 7400G
Popular choices:
NVS 310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7400G is positioned at rank 219 and the NVS 310 is on rank 305, so the Radeon HD 7400G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7400G
Performance Per Dollar NVS 310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon HD 7400G is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon HD 7400G likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 310 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7400G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Radeon HD 7400G, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 54.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7400G and NVS 310
Radeon HD 7400G
The Radeon HD 7400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 267 points.
NVS 310
The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7400G scores 267 and the NVS 310 reaches 275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7400G is built on RDNA 3.0 while the NVS 310 uses Maxwell, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 512 (NVS 310). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 267 | 275+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+250% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+1459% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+123% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 1 MB (NVS 310) — the Radeon HD 7400G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 310). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 7400G) vs Fermi NVENC (NVS 310). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 7400G) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Fermi NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7400G draws 43W versus the NVS 310's 68W — a 45% difference. The Radeon HD 7400G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 350W (NVS 310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-37% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2+55% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7400G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the NVS 310 launched at $159 and now averages $10. The NVS 310 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.8 (Radeon HD 7400G) vs 27.5 (NVS 310) — the NVS 310 offers 54.5% better value. The Radeon HD 7400G is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7400G | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-69% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8 | 27.5+54% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM107 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #229 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7400G and NVS 310
