
Radeon HD 7470M vs Quadro FX 4600

Radeon HD 7470M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7470M is positioned at rank 106 and the Quadro FX 4600 is on rank 404, so the Radeon HD 7470M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7470M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7470M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (1 GB vs 768 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 4600.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7470M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7470M holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $50), it costs 76% less, resulting in a 321.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+321.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($12) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7470M and Quadro FX 4600

Radeon HD 7470M
The Radeon HD 7470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 408 points.

Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7470M scores 408 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7470M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7470M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7470M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 408+1% | 403 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+567% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS+371% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7470M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB. The Radeon HD 7470M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 7470M) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) — the Radeon HD 7470M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+33% | 0.75 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7470M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7470M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7470M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+52% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7470M costs 76% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.0 (Radeon HD 7470M) vs 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) — the Radeon HD 7470M offers 319.8% better value. The Radeon HD 7470M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7470M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12-76% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.0+320% | 8.1 |
| Codename | Wimbledon | GT200B |
| Release | April 24 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #531 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















