
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 3870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual is positioned at rank 551 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is on rank 509, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3870
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $72), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 382.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+382.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($72) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual and Mobility Radeon HD 3870

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual
The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 3870
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual scores 545 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 reaches 548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 545 | 548 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3870's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3870). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.9 | 11.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $72, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 costs 79.2% less ($57 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.6 (Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual) vs 36.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 offers 380.3% better value. The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $129-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $72 | $15-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 36.5+380% |
| Codename | — | Broadway |
| Release | August 1 2013 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #863 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















