Radeon HD 7560D
VS
Quadro FX 3700M

Radeon HD 7560D vs Quadro FX 3700M

AMD

Radeon HD 7560D

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7560D is positioned at rank 244 and the Quadro FX 3700M is on rank 357, so the Radeon HD 7560D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7560D

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1619%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1556%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1537%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1535%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1532%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1523%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1504%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1498%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1484%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1480%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1462%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1459%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1433%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1432%
#229
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1786%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
100%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
98%
#247
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
96%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
94%
#253
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
94%
#254
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
92%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
92%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
89%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M

#342
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
16414%
#357
Quadro FX 3700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
99%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
98%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
96%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
90%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
89%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
89%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
88%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
87%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
87%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
79%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
76%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7560D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3700M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7560D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7560D and Quadro FX 3700M

AMD

Radeon HD 7560D

The Radeon HD 7560D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 452 points. Launch price was $449.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7560D scores 452 and the Quadro FX 3700M reaches 451 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7560D is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 3700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 7560D) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700M). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7560D) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M).

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
G3D Mark Score
452
451
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1792+647%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+361%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+40%
80
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7560D comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700M has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 3700M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7560D) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700M) — the Radeon HD 7560D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7560D) vs 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)+2%
11 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.4+33%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7560D) vs No (Quadro FX 3700M). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs PureVideo VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7560D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M).

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
No
Decoder
UVD 3.0
PureVideo VP2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7560D draws 200W versus the Quadro FX 3700M's 189W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7560D) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
TDP
200W
189W-6%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
2.3
2.4+4%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7560D is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 7560DQuadro FX 3700M
MSRP
$101
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
Tahiti
GT200B
Release
January 31 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#454
#815