
Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M vs Intel UHD Graphics 610

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 610
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is positioned at rank #88 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2009). The Intel UHD Graphics 610 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 610.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M and Intel UHD Graphics 610

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 699 points. Launch price was $159.

Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M scores 699 and the Intel UHD Graphics 610 reaches 687 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 699+2% | 687 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 800+335% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+221% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 40+74% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M draws 108W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 610's 15W — a 151.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W | 15W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.5 | 45.8+605% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | Juniper | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 13 2009 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #730 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












