Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual vs Quadro FX 3800M
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 3800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is positioned at rank 532 and the Quadro FX 3800M is on rank 46, so the Quadro FX 3800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3800M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual and Quadro FX 3800M
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 577 points.
Quadro FX 3800M
The Quadro FX 3800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 572 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual scores 577 and the Quadro FX 3800M reaches 572 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 577 | 572 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800M has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 3800M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual) vs 10 (Quadro FX 3800M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual) vs None (Quadro FX 3800M). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD (VP2).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3800M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5+283% | 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual | Quadro FX 3800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | — | GT200B |
| Release | August 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #881 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual and Quadro FX 3800M
