Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual vs NVS 510
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
Popular choices:
NVS 510
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is positioned at rank 495 and the NVS 510 is on rank 321, so the NVS 510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
Performance Per Dollar NVS 510
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 510 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $35), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 134.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+134.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual and NVS 510
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 677 points.
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual scores 677 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 512 (NVS 510).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 677 | 680 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 ×2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 has 2 GB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual draws 50W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-26% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 160mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+35% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the NVS 510 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The NVS 510 costs 57.1% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 45.3 (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 offers 134.7% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-67% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $15-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 45.3+135% |
| Codename | — | GM107 |
| Release | August 1 2013 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #881 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual and NVS 510
