
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Popular choices:

FirePro V4900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is positioned at rank 524 and the FirePro V4900 is on rank 212, so the FirePro V4900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V4900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V4900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $47), it costs 15% less, resulting in a 16.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($47) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual and FirePro V4900

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 997 points.

FirePro V4900
The FirePro V4900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual scores 997 and the FirePro V4900 reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) vs 480 (FirePro V4900).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 997 | 1,009+1% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+33% | 480 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V4900 has 1 GB. The FirePro V4900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual draws 50W versus the FirePro V4900's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) vs 350W (FirePro V4900). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 163mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.9+47% | 13.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro V4900 launched at $200 and now averages $47. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual costs 14.9% less ($7 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.9 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) vs 21.5 (FirePro V4900) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers 15.8% better value. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual | FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $200-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-15% | $47 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9+16% | 21.5 |
| Codename | — | Turks |
| Release | August 1 2013 | November 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #863 | #882 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













