
Radeon HD 7650A vs FirePro 3D V5700

Radeon HD 7650A
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7650A is positioned at rank 452 and the FirePro 3D V5700 is on rank 355, so the FirePro 3D V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7650A
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7650A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V5700.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $49), it costs 49% less, resulting in a 92.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7650A and FirePro 3D V5700

Radeon HD 7650A
The Radeon HD 7650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.

FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7650A scores 556 and the FirePro 3D V5700 reaches 547 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro 3D V5700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 556+2% | 547 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+505% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 512 KB+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V5700) — the FirePro 3D V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7650A draws 45W versus the FirePro 3D V5700's 274W — a 143.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-84% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.4+520% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7650A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The FirePro 3D V5700 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.3 (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) — the FirePro 3D V5700 offers 93.8% better value. The FirePro 3D V5700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7650A | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-83% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $25-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 21.9+94% |
| Codename | Turks | Tahiti |
| Release | January 5 2012 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #870 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















