Radeon HD 7650A vs Radeon R5 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7650A vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7650A vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7650A

2012

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
69.5% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7650A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7650A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 240 instead at 558 vs 556, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7650A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $41 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.1% (9.5 vs 5.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7650A has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7650A vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7650A

The Radeon HD 7650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7650A scores 556 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240).

Feature	Radeon HD 7650A	Radeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score	556	558
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480+50%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS+29%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24+20%	20
L1 Cache	48 KB	80 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7650A	Radeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7650A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7650A and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240.

Feature	Radeon HD 7650A	Radeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7650A draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 7650A	Radeon R5 240
TDP	45W	30W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	12.4	18.6+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7650A came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 41% cheaper ($41 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon HD 7650A) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 69.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 240 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 7650A	Radeon R5 240
MSRP	$100	$59-41%
Performance per Dollar	5.6	9.5+70%
Codename	Turks	Oland
Release	January 5 2012	October 8 2013
Ranking	#870	#911

Search Radeon HD 7650A on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.