Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual vs Quadro FX 3700
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual is positioned at rank 549 and the Quadro FX 3700 is on rank 401, so the Quadro FX 3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $500), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 389.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+389.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual and Quadro FX 3700
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual
The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.
Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual scores 364 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 364 | 372+2% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3+265% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual costs 80% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.6 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) — the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual offers 414.3% better value. The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-94% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-80% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6+414% | 0.7 |
| Codename | — | GT200B |
| Release | August 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #881 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual and Quadro FX 3700
