
Radeon HD 7730
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7730
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $225 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 75W, a 28W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M275
2014Why buy it
- ✅18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌59.6% higher power demand at 75W vs 47W.
Radeon HD 7730
2013Radeon R9 M275
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $225 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 75W, a 28W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌59.6% higher power demand at 75W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M275 better than Radeon HD 7730?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7730 make more sense than Radeon R9 M275?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7730 and Radeon R9 M275

Radeon HD 7730
Radeon HD 7730
The Radeon HD 7730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $59.

Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7730 scores 1,163 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7730 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,163+4% | 1,115 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+93% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7730 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7730 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7730 draws 47W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 45.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7730) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 47W-37% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.7+66% | 14.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7730 launched at $75 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. The Radeon HD 7730 costs 75% less ($225 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon HD 7730 offers 318.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M275 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7730 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-75% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5+319% | 3.7 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Venus |
| Release | May 1 2013 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #841 | #851 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













