Radeon HD 7730 vs Radeon R9 M275

AMD

Radeon HD 7730

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7730 vs Radeon R9 M275 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7730 vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7730 vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7730

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $225 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 317.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 47W instead of 75W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

  • 18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 300% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • 59.6% higher power demand at 75W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M275 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7730 instead at 1,163 vs 1,115, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7730 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7730 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $225 cheaper on MSRP at $75 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 317.2% (15.5 vs 3.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M275 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7730 vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7730

The Radeon HD 7730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $59.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7730 scores 1,163 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7730 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score
1,163+4%
1,115
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+93%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7730Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7730 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7730 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7730 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7730 draws 47W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 45.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7730) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730Radeon R9 M275
TDP
47W-37%
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
24.7+66%
14.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7730 came in at $75, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7730 was 75% cheaper ($225 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.5 (Radeon HD 7730) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon HD 7730 offers 318.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730Radeon R9 M275
MSRP
$75-75%
$300
Performance per Dollar
15.5+319%
3.7
Codename
Cape Verde
Venus
Release
May 1 2013
January 28 2014
Ranking
#841
#851

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.