Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7730

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7730 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 47W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7730

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 7730 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌56.7% higher power demand at 47W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (1,172 vs 1,163), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7730 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7730 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $75 cheaper on MSRP at $75 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.5% (15.5 vs 7.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Iris Pro Graphics 5200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7730 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon HD 7730

The Radeon HD 7730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $59.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 7730 reaches 1,163 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon HD 7730 uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7730). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7730
G3D Mark Score	1,172	1,163
Architecture	Generation 7.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	22 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	384+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+25%	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8+100%
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7730
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7730 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7730 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7730.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7730
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7730's 47W — a 44.2% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7730). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7730
TDP	30W-36%	47W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Perf/Watt	39.1+58%	24.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the Radeon HD 7730 launched at $75. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7730 was 50% cheaper ($75 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 15.5 (Radeon HD 7730) — the Radeon HD 7730 offers 98.7% better value.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7730
MSRP	$150	$75-50%
Performance per Dollar	7.8	15.5+99%
Codename	Haswell GT3e	Cape Verde
Release	May 27 2013	May 1 2013
Ranking	#835	#841

Search Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7730 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.