
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7730
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 47W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β100% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7730
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $75 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Pro Graphics 5200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β56.7% higher power demand at 47W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Radeon HD 7730
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 47W, a 17W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Costs $75 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Pro Graphics 5200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β100% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β56.7% higher power demand at 47W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 better than Radeon HD 7730?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7730 make more sense than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7730

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon HD 7730
Radeon HD 7730
The Radeon HD 7730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $59.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 7730 reaches 1,163 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon HD 7730 uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7730). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,163 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+25% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7730 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7730 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7730's 47W β a 44.2% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7730). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-36% | 47W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+58% | 24.7 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7730 launched at $75. The Radeon HD 7730 costs 50% less ($75 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 15.5 (Radeon HD 7730) β the Radeon HD 7730 offers 98.7% better value.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7730 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $75-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 15.5+99% |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 27 2013 | May 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #835 | #841 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













