GeForce GT 650M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 650M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 650M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 650M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 650M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 7.5 (2013) on 22nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 650M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,187 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 650M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 650M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 650M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 650M scores 1,187 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 650M is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 650M) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MIris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,187+1%
1,172
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 7.5
Process Node
28 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1200 MHz+26%
ROPs
16+300%
4
TMUs
32
40+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 650M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MIris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 650M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 650M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 650M and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MIris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 650M draws 45W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 40% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 650M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MIris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
45W
30W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4
39.1+48%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MIris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK107
Haswell GT3e
Release
March 22 2012
May 27 2013
Ranking
#828
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.