GeForce GT 650M
VS
Quadro M500M

GeForce GT 650M vs Quadro M500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M500M

2016Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 650M is positioned at rank 188 and the Quadro M500M is on rank 31, so the Quadro M500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 650M

#178
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
366%
#180
332%
#181
331%
#185
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
301%
#186
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
299%
#188
GeForce GT 650M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
95%
#197
94%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M500M

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
90%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
85%
#16
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
378%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
79%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
78%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
78%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
78%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
77%
#31
Quadro M500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
94%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
82%
#43
P106-100
MSRP: $224|Avg: $30
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 650M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M500M.

InsightGeForce GT 650MQuadro M500M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 650M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 650M and Quadro M500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M500M

The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 650M scores 1,187 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 650M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 650M) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MQuadro M500M
G3D Mark Score
1,187+1%
1,172
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS+18%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1124 MHz+18%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+100%
16
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 650MQuadro M500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 650M) vs 1 MB (Quadro M500M) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MQuadro M500M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 650M draws 45W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 650M) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MQuadro M500M
TDP
45W
30W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4
39.1+48%