FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GT 650M

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GT 650M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GT 650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 508.9% higher power demand at 274W vs 45W.

GeForce GT 650M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 274W, a 229W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,206 vs 1,187), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GT 650M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the GeForce GT 650M reaches 1,187 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 650M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 650M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
G3D Mark Score
1,206+2%
1,187
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+377%
0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+1500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 650M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V8700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 650M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 650M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 650M. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 650M) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
DirectX
10.1
12 (FL11_0)+19%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
Encoder
UVD 2
NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
UVD 2
VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the GeForce GT 650M's 45W — a 143.6% difference. The GeForce GT 650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
TDP
274W
45W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
26.4+500%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GT 650M
MSRP
$1499
Codename
Tahiti
GK107
Release
January 18 2014
March 22 2012
Ranking
#423
#828

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.