
FirePro 3D V5800

FirePro 3D V8700
FirePro 3D V5800 vs FirePro 3D V8700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V5800 vs FirePro 3D V8700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V5800 vs FirePro 3D V8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V5800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,020 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 274W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 254mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
FirePro 3D V8700
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌212.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌270.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 74W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 254mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V5800 vs FirePro 3D V8700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the FirePro 3D V8700 reaches 1,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro 3D V8700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232+2% | 1,206 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+215% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5800 and 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1+24% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the FirePro 3D V8700's 274W — a 114.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 254mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-73% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 254mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 70°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+277% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V5800 came in at $479, while the FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V5800 was 68% cheaper ($1020 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) — the FirePro 3D V5800 offers 225% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479-68% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6+225% | 0.8 |
| Codename | Juniper | Tahiti |
| Release | April 26 2010 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #780 | #423 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















