
FirePro 3D V5800

Iris Graphics 540
FirePro 3D V5800 vs Iris Graphics 540 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V5800 vs Iris Graphics 540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V5800 vs Iris Graphics 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V5800
2010Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- β Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V5800 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β393.3% higher power demand at 74W vs 15W.
Iris Graphics 540
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 74W, a 59W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V5800 vs Iris Graphics 540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

Iris Graphics 540
The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the Iris Graphics 540 reaches 1,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Graphics 540 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 540). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,270+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+44% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 540 carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V5800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5800 and System on the Iris Graphics 540.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (FL 12_1)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs Quick Sync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | Quick Sync |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | Quick Sync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the Iris Graphics 540's 15W β a 132.6% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 84.7+410% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V5800 came in at $479, while the Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 540 was 100+% cheaper ($479 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) β the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 540 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Skylake GT3e |
| Release | April 26 2010 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #808 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















