FirePro 3D V5800 vs HD Graphics P630
FirePro 3D V5800
Popular choices:
HD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V5800 is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The HD Graphics P630 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The HD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V5800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics P630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V5800 and HD Graphics P630
FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.
HD Graphics P630
The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the HD Graphics P630 reaches 1,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the HD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 192 (HD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,280+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+161% | 0.4224 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V5800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P630). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs Quick Sync Video (HD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (HD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the HD Graphics P630's 15W — a 132.6% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 1W (HD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 85.3+414% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the HD Graphics P630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The HD Graphics P630 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P630) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | August 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #780 | #822 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V5800 and HD Graphics P630
