
FirePro 3D V5800 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

FirePro 3D V5800
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V5800 is positioned at rank 264 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 336, so the FirePro 3D V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 197.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V5800 and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,222 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+4% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V5800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 50W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 24.4+47% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 197.3% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $100-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.1 | 122.2+197% |
| Codename | Juniper | — |
| Release | April 26 2010 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #780 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















