FirePro 3D V5800
VS
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

FirePro 3D V5800 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

FirePro 3D V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V5800 is positioned at rank 264 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 336, so the FirePro 3D V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
91%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
91%
#249
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5748%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
100%
#265
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
97%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
97%
#267
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
97%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
97%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
96%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
96%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
95%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
94%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
93%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
91%
#277
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
91%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

#326
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
888%
#328
805%
#329
803%
#333
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
730%
#334
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
725%
#336
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
91%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 3D V5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.

InsightFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 197.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+197.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V5800 and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

AMD

FirePro 3D V5800

The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
G3D Mark Score
1,232
1,222
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+4%
768

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V5800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V5800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
TDP
74W
50W-32%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
16.6
24.4+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 197.3% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP
$479
$100-79%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$10-67%
Performance per Dollar
41.1
122.2+197%
Codename
Juniper
Release
April 26 2010
August 1 2013
Ranking
#780
#881