
FirePro 3D V5800

GeForce 930MX
FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce 930MX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce 930MX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce 930MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V5800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌498.8% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 16.0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌335.3% higher power demand at 74W vs 17W.
GeForce 930MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 521.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 74W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V5800 vs GeForce 930MX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V5800 scores 1,232 and the GeForce 930MX reaches 1,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 930MX uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 384 (GeForce 930MX). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,278+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+41% | 0.7834 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 930MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V5800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V5800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930MX carries 2 GB. GeForce 930MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V5800 and 128-bit on the GeForce 930MX. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs None (GeForce 930MX). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V5800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 930MX's 17W — a 125.3% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 350W (GeForce 930MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 17W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 75.2+353% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V5800 came in at $479, while the GeForce 930MX launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 930MX was 83.3% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (FirePro 3D V5800) vs 16.0 (GeForce 930MX) — the GeForce 930MX offers 515.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 930MX (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V5800 | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $80-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 16.0+515% |
| Codename | Juniper | GM108 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | March 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #780 | #805 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















