
FirePro 3D V8700 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

FirePro 3D V8700
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V8700 is positioned at rank #365 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8700 and Intel UHD Graphics 630

FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,206 | 1,231+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 2048+1013% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+723% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+457% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8700 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V8700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 82.1+1766% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $1229, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 costs 100+% less ($1229 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1229 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #423 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












