FirePro 3D V8700 vs UHD Graphics 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V8700 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,231 vs 1,206), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V8700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 630 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8700	Intel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score	1,206	1,231+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	2048+1013%	184
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+723%	0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	128+457%	23

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V8700	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V8700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8700	Intel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8700	Intel UHD Graphics 630
TDP	274W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.4	82.1+1766%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8700	Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSRP	$1499	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	Infinity
Codename	Tahiti	Comet Lake GT2
Release	January 18 2014	October 1 2017
Ranking	#423	#824

Search FirePro 3D V8700 on Amazon

Search Intel UHD Graphics 630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.