FirePro 3D V8700
VS
GeForce GTX 460M

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GTX 460M

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8700 is positioned at rank 365 and the GeForce GTX 460M is on rank 181, so the GeForce GTX 460M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700

#350
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18466%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
100%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
100%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
99%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
98%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
98%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
89%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
85%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
83%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
81%
#374
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
76%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
76%
#376
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
76%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
75%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
72%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
70%
#380
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 460M

#171
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
357%
#173
323%
#174
322%
#178
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
293%
#179
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
291%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8700.

InsightFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $1,229), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3003.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3003.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,229)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8700 and GeForce GTX 460M

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the GeForce GTX 460M reaches 1,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 460M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 460M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
G3D Mark Score
1,206
1,218
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+572%
0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+100%
384 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 460M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1.5 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+100%
384 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
DirectX
10.1
12 (11_0)+19%
Vulkan
None
1.2
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
Encoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 460M's 50W — a 138.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
TDP
274W
50W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
254mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
24.4+455%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460M costs 96.7% less ($1189 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 30.4 (GeForce GTX 460M) — the GeForce GTX 460M offers 2940% better value. The FirePro 3D V8700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP
$1499
Avg Price (30d)
$1229
$40-97%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
30.4+2940%
Codename
Tahiti
GF106
Release
January 18 2014
September 3 2010
Ranking
#423
#814