FirePro 3D V8700 vs FirePro V5900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V8700 vs FirePro V5900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V8700 vs FirePro V5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V8700
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌265.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 75W.
FirePro V5900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 274W, a 199W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 254mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8700 vs FirePro V5900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the FirePro V5900 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro V5900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 512 (FirePro V5900). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,206 | 1,232+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+467% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5900 carries 2 GB. FirePro V5900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 64-bit on the FirePro V5900. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 512 KB (FirePro V5900) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5900). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs None (FirePro V5900). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the FirePro V5900's 75W — a 114% difference. The FirePro V5900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (FirePro V5900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 75W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 16.4+273% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the FirePro V5900 launched at $599. On MSRP, FirePro V5900 was 60% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 2.1 (FirePro V5900) — the FirePro V5900 offers 162.5% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8700 | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $599-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 2.1+163% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #423 | #812 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















