Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro 2000 D

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V8700
1 GB 274
1,206
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 XT
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon HD 6750M
brand logoRadeon R7 M460
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Quadro 2000 D
4 GB 62
1,239
+2.7%
brand logoGeForce GT 630
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 840M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    150.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • ❌341.9% higher power demand at 274W vs 62W.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 157.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 62W instead of 274W, a 212W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 178mm instead of 254mm, a 76mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000 D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (1,239 vs 1,206), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $900 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 157.1% (2.1 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 2000 D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V8700 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score
1,206
1,239+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+625%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
DirectX
10.1
12 (11_0)+19%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 2 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
Encoder
UVD 2
—
Decoder
UVD 2
NVDEC 1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 126.2% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 178mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
TDP
274W
62W-77%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
178mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
20.0+355%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. On MSRP, Quadro 2000 D was 60% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 162.5% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro 2000 D
MSRP
$1499
$599-60%
Performance per Dollar
0.8
2.1+163%
Codename
Tahiti
GF106
Release
January 18 2014
October 5 2011
Ranking
#423
#892
Search FirePro 3D V8700 on AmazonSearch Quadro 2000 D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.