FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro FX 5800

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro FX 5800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 45% higher power demand at 274W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 274W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 133.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,499 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 5800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,211 vs 1,206), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $1,499 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 132.5% (0.8 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 5800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro FX 5800
G3D Mark Score
1,206
1,211
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2048+753%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+460%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro FX 5800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5800 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro FX 5800
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 36.7% difference. The Quadro FX 5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro FX 5800
TDP
274W
189W-31%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
6.4+45%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V8700 was 57.2% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the FirePro 3D V8700 offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700Quadro FX 5800
MSRP
$1499-57%
$3499
Performance per Dollar
0.8+167%
0.3
Codename
Tahiti
GT200B
Release
January 18 2014
November 11 2008
Ranking
#423
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.