Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R5 430 OEM is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon R5 430 OEM uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,200+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+28% | 0.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+54% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 OEM carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 430 OEM gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and System on the Radeon R5 430 OEM.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 430 OEM's 50W — a 50% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 250W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+63% | 24.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R5 430 OEM (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Oland |
| Release | May 27 2013 | June 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #835 | #874 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM
