Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 295
1.75 GB 289
1,198
+2.2%
brand logoGeForce GT 530
brand logoGeForce GT 740M
brand logoGeForce GT 640M
brand logoGeForce 920MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 4060
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Shared System RAM 30
1,172
0.0%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 295 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    232.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌863.3% higher power demand at 289W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 225.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 289W, a 259W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,198 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 225.4% (7.8 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 295 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 55 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Iris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,198+2%
1,172
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Generation 7.5
Process Node
55 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
480 ×2+50%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5962 TFLOPS ×2
0.768 TFLOPS+29%
ROPs
28 ×2+600%
4
TMUs
80 ×2+100%
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Iris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
1.75 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 162.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
289W
30W-90%
Recommended PSU
680W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
—
Temp (Load)
95°C
—
Perf/Watt
4.1
39.1+854%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 69.9% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 225% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$499
$150-70%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
7.8+225%
Codename
GT200B
Haswell GT3e
Release
January 8 2009
May 27 2013
Ranking
#816
#835
Search GeForce GTX 295 on AmazonSearch Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.