GeForce GTX 295
VS
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

2023Core: 450 MHzBoost: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 295 is positioned at rank #301 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3023%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2904%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2870%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2865%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2859%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2843%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2807%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2797%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2771%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2763%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2730%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2724%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2675%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2673%
#286
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3333%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
100%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
99%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#305
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#306
Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
95%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#311
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
90%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
88%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
83%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
81%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2009). The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 295 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 295 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) uses Gen. 12, both on 55 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
G3D Mark Score
1,198
1,200
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 12
Process Node
55 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
480 ×2+1900%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 295 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
VRAM Capacity
1.75 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)'s 15W — a 180.3% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
TDP
289W
15W-95%
Recommended PSU
680W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
4.1
80.0+1851%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.0 (GeForce GTX 295) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) — the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
MSRP
$499
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
24.0
Infinity
Codename
GT200B
Alder Lake Xe
Release
January 8 2009
January 3 2023
Ranking
#816
#914