Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GTX 295

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GTX 295 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V8700
1 GB 274
1,206
+0.7%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 XT
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon HD 6750M
brand logoRadeon R7 M460
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GTX 295
1.75 GB 289
1,198
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 530
brand logoGeForce GT 740M
brand logoGeForce GT 640M
brand logoGeForce 920MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GTX 295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    200.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 198.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,206 vs 1,198), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 295 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,000 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 198.4% (2.4 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 295 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V8700 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs GeForce GTX 295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the GeForce GTX 295 reaches 1,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 295 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 295). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
G3D Mark Score
1,206
1,198
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2048+327%
480 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+484%
0.5962 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32+14%
28 ×2
TMUs
128+60%
80 ×2
L2 Cache
768 KB+243%
224 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V8700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 295 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 75% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) — the FirePro 3D V8700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1.75 GB+75%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+243%
224 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_0)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
Encoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 295's 289W — a 5.3% difference. The FirePro 3D V8700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 680W (GeForce GTX 295). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
TDP
274W-5%
289W
Recommended PSU
350W-49%
680W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
254mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-26%
95°C
Perf/Watt
4.4+7%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 295 was 66.7% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) — the GeForce GTX 295 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8700 (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700GeForce GTX 295
MSRP
$1499
$499-67%
Performance per Dollar
0.8
2.4+200%
Codename
Tahiti
GT200B
Release
January 18 2014
January 8 2009
Ranking
#423
#816
Search FirePro 3D V8700 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.