GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 295

1.75 GB 289

1,198

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 4060

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

0.5 GB 100

1,217

+1.6%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
42.6% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
❌189% higher power demand at 289W vs 100W.

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

2015

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 289W, a 189W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,217 vs 1,198), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.8% (3.5 vs 2.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 295 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U reaches 1,217 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
G3D Mark Score	1,198	1,217+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480 ×2	1024+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2	1.997 TFLOPS+235%
ROPs	28 ×2	32+14%
TMUs	80 ×2+25%	64
L2 Cache	224 KB	512 KB+129%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 250% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 512 KB (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
VRAM Capacity	1.75 GB+250%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	224 KB	512 KB+129%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U's 100W — a 97.2% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
TDP	289W	100W-65%
Recommended PSU	680W	350W-49%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	95°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	12.2+198%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U was 29.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U offers 45.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U (2015 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP	$499	$350-30%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	3.5+46%
Codename	GT200B	Trinidad
Release	January 8 2009	June 18 2015
Ranking	#816	#467

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Search Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.