GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

  • 54.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 478% higher power demand at 289W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 460M

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 289W, a 239W reduction.
  • More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 460M instead at 1,218 vs 1,198, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 295 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the GeForce GTX 460M reaches 1,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460M uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 460M). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
G3D Mark Score
1,198
1,218+2%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480 ×2+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5962 TFLOPS ×2+15%
0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs
28 ×2+17%
24
TMUs
80 ×2+150%
32
L2 Cache
224 KB
384 KB+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 16.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) — the GeForce GTX 460M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
VRAM Capacity
1.75 GB+17%
1.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
224 KB
384 KB+71%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)+8%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the GeForce GTX 460M's 50W — a 141% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
TDP
289W
50W-83%
Recommended PSU
680W
350W-49%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
95°C
80°C-16%
Perf/Watt
4.1
24.4+495%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP
$499
Codename
GT200B
GF106
Release
January 8 2009
September 3 2010
Ranking
#816
#814

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.