GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 295
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 295 is positioned at rank #301 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2009). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 295 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1318.6% higher G3D Mark score and 585.7% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 295.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1318.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1318.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 145.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 295.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 295
The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1318.6%. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,198 | 16,995+1319% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 ×2 | 3584+647% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 | 12.74 TFLOPS+2037% |
| ROPs | 28 ×2 | 48+71% |
| TMUs | 80 ×2 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 0.22 MB | 3 MB+1264% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 295 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 585.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.75 GB | 12 GB+586% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.22 MB | 3 MB+1264% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 289W | 170W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 680W | 550W-19% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 100.0+2339% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce GTX 295 costs 82.7% less ($239 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.0 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 145% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $329-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-83% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.0 | 58.8+145% |
| Codename | GT200B | GA106 |
| Release | January 8 2009 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #816 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce RTX 3060
