GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

2009Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

  • 3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 593.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 52.9% higher power demand at 289W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

  • 128.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 189W instead of 289W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 601.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 5800 instead at 1,211 vs 1,198, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2009 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 295 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,000 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 593.7% (2.4 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Quadro FX 5800
G3D Mark Score
1,198
1,211+1%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
480 ×2+100%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5962 TFLOPS ×2
0.6221 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs
28 ×2
32+14%
TMUs
80 ×2
80
L2 Cache
224 KB
256 KB+14%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 5800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Quadro FX 5800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5800 gives you 128.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the Quadro FX 5800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Quadro FX 5800
VRAM Capacity
1.75 GB
4 GB+129%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
224 KB
256 KB+14%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 41.8% difference. The Quadro FX 5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Quadro FX 5800
TDP
289W
189W-35%
Recommended PSU
680W
350W-49%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
4.1
6.4+56%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 295 was 85.7% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the GeForce GTX 295 offers 700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 295 (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 295Quadro FX 5800
MSRP
$499-86%
$3499
Performance per Dollar
2.4+700%
0.3
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
January 8 2009
November 11 2008
Ranking
#816
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.