
GeForce GTX 295

Quadro FX 5800
GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 295
2009Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 593.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 289W vs 189W.
Quadro FX 5800
2008Why buy it
- ✅128.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 289W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌601.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 295
The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Quadro FX 5800
The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,198 | 1,211+1% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 ×2+100% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.6221 TFLOPS+4% |
| ROPs | 28 ×2 | 32+14% |
| TMUs | 80 ×2 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 5800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5800 gives you 128.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the Quadro FX 5800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.75 GB | 4 GB+129% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 41.8% difference. The Quadro FX 5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 289W | 189W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 680W | 350W-49% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 6.4+56% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 295 came in at $499, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 295 was 85.7% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the GeForce GTX 295 offers 700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 295 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-86% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4+700% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | GT200B |
| Release | January 8 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #816 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















