GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
GeForce GTX 295
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 295 is positioned at rank 301 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 336, so the GeForce GTX 295 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 295 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+250%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 410% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+410%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
GeForce GTX 295
The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,198 | 1,222+2% |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 ×2 | 768+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 295 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 295 offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.75 GB+250% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 141% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 289W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 680W | 350W-49% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 24.4+495% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.0 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 409.2% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $100-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.0 | 122.2+409% |
| Codename | GT200B | — |
| Release | January 8 2009 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #816 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
