GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 295
Popular choices:
FirePro V5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 295 is positioned at rank 301 and the FirePro V5800 is on rank 269, so the FirePro V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 295 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 229.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+229.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 295 and FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 295
The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.
FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the FirePro V5800 reaches 1,184 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FirePro V5800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 800 (FirePro V5800). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,198+1% | 1,184 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 ×2 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.104 TFLOPS+85% |
| ROPs | 28 ×2+75% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 ×2+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 295 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V5800 offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 256 KB (FirePro V5800) — the FirePro V5800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.75 GB | 4 GB+129% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs No (FirePro V5800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the FirePro V5800's 74W — a 118.5% difference. The FirePro V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (FirePro V5800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 59°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 289W | 74W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 680W | 350W-49% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 59°C-38% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 16.0+290% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro V5800 launched at $479 and now averages $15. The FirePro V5800 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.0 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 78.9 (FirePro V5800) — the FirePro V5800 offers 228.8% better value. The FirePro V5800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 295 | FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $479-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.0 | 78.9+229% |
| Codename | GT200B | Juniper |
| Release | January 8 2009 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #816 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 295 and FirePro V5800
